Saturday, January 23, 2010

Failure is Not an Option

By Dave

A plethora of health care opinions, all making the case for why we need to pass HCR, and all saying it better than I could:

William Galston
The Founders designed a representative republic, not a plebiscitary democracy. Officials are elected to make judgments on behalf of the people, and the people get to judge those judgments. Large changes are always more uncertain than is the status quo, which is why change is so hard. At some point, elected officials have to tell their constituents, “I’ve done my best to think this issue through, and this is the conclusion I’ve reached. Now it’s your turn.”
Greg Sargent
But if Dems don’t pass reform, they will never have a chance to sell a completed package to the public — and to try to convince the public that they were right, and Republicans were wrong. People will never have a chance to decide that their fears about reform were unwarranted.
Not passing reform won’t stop Republicans from attacking Dems for trying to jam an unpopular bill down the public’s throat. And failure would give Republicans more ammo, not less. It would allow the GOP to take credit for blocking the proposal, to present itself as an effective and relevant opposition, and to paint Dems — accurately — as ineffective and unable to lead.
Kevin Drum
This really is a defining moment for both Obama and the Democratic Party more broadly. So far both have failed miserably: the party is in a state of meltdown, surrendering completely to a resurgent Republican narrative, refusing to fight for anything it believes in, and caving in to a truly toxic combination of electoral fear and narrow interest group parochialism. For his part, Obama seems either unable or unwilling to rally his troops. I'm not sure which. But the American public really needs to hear some conviction from him, and so far they haven't. He's remained aloof from the healthcare upheaval, pivoted on financial regulation in a way that looks driven more by politics than by core beliefs, and has just generally sounded more chastened than reinvigorated.
This really needs to turn around fast. Another week like this — hell, another day or two like this — and we might as well start measuring the Oval Office drapes for the upcoming Cheney/Palin administration. It's time for everyone to take a deep breath and grow a pair. Today would be a good time to start.
Think Progress
Trying to pass a scaled-back version of reform would drag out the process, fail to substantially lower costs or improve access, and do so without any assurance that it will be any more popular in Congress. Democrats therefore have two choices: pass an improved version of the Senate health care bill or abandon the effort altogether. If Democrats chose the latter, millions more Americans would go without health care and health care costs would continue to skyrocket. Politically, the Democratic Party will be ridiculed for talking a big game but delivering no results. They will lose their progressive base and outsource their agenda to the Republican minority — all simply because their supermajority of 60 shrank to 59.
Paul Krugman
First of all, the strategy of playing Republican-lite, and hoping that you’ll be left alone, has been tried — and failed disastrously. Remember 2002?
Second, David Axelrod is right: the campaign against HCR has been based on lies, and the only way to refute those lies (and stop them from being rolled out again and again) is to pass the thing, and let people see it in action. It’s too bad startup is delayed under the Senate bill — but even so, that’s what you have to do.
Finally, Democrats have to realize that politics isn’t just about where you stand on issues, it’s about perceptions of a party’s character. The rap on Dems has always been that they’re wimps — and giving in on such a central part of the party’s agenda, emerging from two years in power with nothing major to show for it, will play right into that perception.
Just do it — pass health care. Then move on to confronting the bankers.
Andrew Sullivan
This is about more than health reform and we have to see it in that context. This is about a cynical nihilist attempt to break this presidency before it has had a chance to do what we elected it to do by a landslide vote. It is an attempt to destroy a majority's morale, to break a president's foreign policy autonomy, to prevent engagement in the Middle East peace process, to stop action on climate change, to restore torture, to increase tensions with the Muslim world, to launch a war on Iran. We cannot delude ourselves that if Obama fails, this is not the alternative. It is.
And we have to re-engage as powerfully as we did in the campaign to fight back against these now emboldened forces of reaction. I think this is true not just for the sake of the country but also for the sake of the GOP. The nihilist obstructionism and rhetoric they have embraced makes constitutional democracy close to impossible. Their total lack of any workable alternatives to dire problems is a form of degeneracy we have to avoid empowering.
So fight, Mr President. And to the House Democrats who won't go along with the only way to salvage health reform: this is the only sure-fire way you will lose in November. If you pass this bill, you may also go down in this climate. But you will have done something you can be proud of. Politics cannot always be about narrow self-interest. If it always is, nothing important can get done.
Do your duty. And grow some. Fight back. Explain why you're right. Tell the liberals they can always come back later to reform the bill. Just get this passed.

Defending the Senate Health Bill

By Dave

A reader responds to this post:
Barney Frank is right and Dave is wrong. The Senate bill mandates everyone buy insurnace from the companies who have messed up the system and transfers about a trillion dollars to those companies. If this were to happen, I doubt the voters would look favorably on the Democrats.

The Senate Dems need to change the cloture rules so that business can be conducted with a simple majority and then pass progressive legislation.

Yes, the House Bill creates a public option for insurance. But it is exactly that, an option. People don’t have to use it and will only use it if it can actually provide cheaper service. Otherwise both bills call for an individual mandate, which is what I think the comment is talking about. So under both bills people will purchase insurance from the private companies. According to the CBO, even with the public option, the majority of people will still buy from the private sector.

But while the companies will still be private, the service they provide will be very different. New regulation in the Senate Bill provides for stronger medical loss ratios, excludes insurers who jack up premiums from the exchanges; prohibits excluding people based on pre-existing conditions and will immediately prohibit excluding children with preexisting conditions; ensures access to care by banning the use of annual limits; and it adds new patient protections and a guaranteed independent appeals process. It will add transparency by forcing insurers and providers to report on their performance.

The Senate bill does a lot to reform our system, to add morality and justice back into the picture, and it will force insurers to comply.

I don't really follow the comment about transferring insurance companies a trillion dollars. The bill actually gives people, that is America workers, mothers, fathers, and children, subsidies to help them buy insurance over the next decade. It’s true that money will end up with insurers, but at the end of the day those millions of people will also be happier and healthier. It’s kind of like saying food stamps are awful because they subsidize big Agri-business or saying we shouldn't subsidize the costs of medicine for seniors because we’re only subsidizing big Pharma. It’s true, I guess. But it neglects the fact that tens of millions will now have coverage and hundreds of thousands of lives will be saved over the course of a decade.

Krugman is right, believing that killing the Senate Bill will somehow move us closer to universal coverage is the underpants gnome theory of business.

However, I do agree that Dems should change the cloture rules. The filibuster has been too used and abused over the last year.

Friday, January 22, 2010

I (Heart) Conan O'Brien

By Dave

Conan sticks it to the man! The real magic begins around 1:30

Pregnant Mommies better have Clean Teeth

by E.doc

This is a pretty scary one. A new study suggests that oral bacteria present in a pregnant mother's mouth may pass through her blood stream to the fetus, being the main cause of death for some stillborn babies. This hits home for me because my older sister has had two failed pregnancies.

It is widely known that when a woman is pregnant, her body goes through some very intense changes. What is not widely known, however, is that the hormone fluctuations in her body can cause bleeding of the gums in her mouth. This means that there is now an open passageway (a bleeding cut) to the bloodstream. This open passageway can allow bacteria, which the mouth is full of, into the bloodstream. The bacteria can then enter the fetus via the mother's blood. Babies are not born with very good immune systems. This is why they are always sick with a runny nose, always get fevers, etc. They build up their immune system as they grow. This is also why immunizations can be so important to the health of most babies. If a fetus is attacked by bacteria before it has even had a chance to build up an immune system, there is not much hope for the fetus fighting it off on it's own.

Usually the mother's immune system would fight off such an infection, but what if mom gets sick? In the study mentioned above, the mother was fighting off an upper respiratory infection. Her immune system simply got overloaded and could not fight off the infection that was responsible for killing the fetus.

Anyone who has heart troubles knows that a clean mouth is important. As a kid I personally had a heart murmur, and every time I had to visit the dentist/orthodontist, I was required to take antibiotics beforehand to help fight off any bacteria that would enter my bloodstream through my gums.

At any given time, your mouth has more than twenty different kinds of bacteria happily loving in it. And that is just in your mouth, not including your throat (where your lymph nodes or "tonsils" are), your lungs, or the skin around your mouth.

Moral of the story? If you are trying to get pregnant or know someone who is, make sure to tell them to visit the dentist before they get pregnant, and also to keep good oral hygiene.

The life of their baby may depend on it.


thanks to textbookofbacteriology.net and riversidephotography.co.uk for the pics

Thursday, January 21, 2010

Underpants Gnome's Health Care Plan

By Dave

Krugman explains the House Democrats plan:
It’s the Underpants Gnomes business plan. In its original form this was:
1. Collect underpants.
2. ?????
3. Profit!
The current version is:
1. Reject the only bill that can be enacted any time soon.
2. ?????
3. Universal coverage!
Sigh.
Saddly, this looks like it might really be the case...

For those not in the know:

Don't Give Up, Call Your Representative!

By Dave

I've said time and time again that the Senate Bill is much better than the status quo. Those who support reform need to give Democrats more political coverage and remind them of the stakes. This is a come to Jesus moment for progressives. The Senate Bill is not getting any more progressive. We either take what we have (which is not a bad deal), or we accept nothing. If we accept nothing, we admit defeat. We admit Democrats are unfit to govern, that Democrats are weak, that the tea-partiers know what's best for America, that Republicans were more in touch all along, and we walk into a political bloodbath this November.

These are the political stakes. The moral stakes are higher. Insurance companies will continue to deny people based on pre-existing conditions, costs will continue to spiral out of control, more and more will continue to file for bankruptcy, the deficit will continue unabated until we are faced with the collapse of major entitlement programs, and more and more Americans will go without coverage. This is unacceptable.

I'm asking everyone to call your elected representatives and urge them to pass the Senate Bill. Go to this link for contact info.

Kevin Drum provides a helpful list of other Reps who could use a phone call:

Public Option
Blue Dogs
Earl Blumenauer (OR-03)
Corrine Brown (FL-03)
Andre Carson (IN-07)
Judy Chu (CA-32)
Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05)
Mike Capuano (MA-08)
John Conyers (MI-14)
Elijah Cummings (MD-07)
Bill Delahunt (MA-10)
Lloyd Doggett (TX-25)
Donna Edwards (MD-04)
Keith Ellison (MN-05)
Chaka Fattah (PA-02)
Bob Filner (CA-51)
Barney Frank (MA-14)
Marcia Fudge (OH-11)
Luis Gutierrez (IL-04)
Alcee Hastings (FL-23)
Maurice Hinchey (NY-22)
Mazie Hirono (HI-02)
Michael Honda (CA-15)
Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-02)
Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hank Johnson (GA-04)
Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)
Carolyn Kilpatrick (MI-13)
Dennis Kucinich (OH-10)
Barbara Lee (CA-09)
Carolyn Maloney (NY-14)
Eric Massa (NY-29)
Jim McDermott (WA-07)
Jim McGovern (MA-03)
Gwen Moore (WI-04)
Jerry Nadler (NY-08)
Grace Napolitano (CA-38)
John Olver (MA-01)
Bill Pascrell (NJ-08)
Donald Payne (NJ-10)
Chellie Pingree (MN-01)
Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Lucille Roybal-Alard (CA-34)
Linda Sanchez (CA-39)
Jose Serrano (NY-16)
Albio Sires (NJ-13)
Jackie Spier (CA-12)
Pete Stark (CA-13)
Bennie Thompson (MS-02)
John Tierney (MA-06)
Ed Towns (NY-10)
Nydia Valezquez (NY-12)
Maxine Waters (CA-35)
Diane Watson (CA-33)
Mel Watts (NC-12)
Lynn Woolsey (CA-06)
John Yarmuth (KY-03)
Jason Altmire (PA-4)
Mike Arcuri (NY-24)
Joe Baca (CA-43)
John Barrow (GA-12)
Robert Marion Berry (AR-1)
Sanford Bishop (GA-2)
Dan Boren (OK-2)
Leonard Boswell (IA-3)
Allen Boyd (FL-2)
Bobby Bright (AL-2)
Dennis Cardoza (CA-18)
Christopher Carney (PA-10)
Ben Chandler (KY-6)
Travis Childers (MS-1)
Jim Cooper (TN-5)
Jim Costa (CA-20)
Henry Cuellar (TX-28)
Kathy Dahlkemper (PA-3)
Lincoln Davis (TN-4)
Joe Donnelly (IN-2)
Brad Ellsworth (IN-8)
Bill Foster (IL-14)
Gabrielle Giffords (AZ-8)
Bart Gordon (TN-6)
Jane Harman (CA-36)
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD-AL)
Baron Hill (IN-9)
Tim Holden (PA-17)
Frank Kratovil (MD-1)
Betsy Markey (CO-4)
Jim Marshall (GA-8)
Jim Matheson (UT-2)
Mike McIntyre (NC-7)
Charlie Melancon (LA-3)
Mike Michaud (ME-2)
Walt Minnick (ID-1)
Dennis Moore (KS-3)
Patrick Murphy (PA-8)
Scott Murphy (NY-20)
Glenn Nye (VA-2)
Collin Peterson (MN-7)
Earl Pomeroy (ND-AL)
Mike Ross (AR-4)
John Salazar (CO-3)
Loretta Sanchez (CA-47)
Adam Schiff (CA-29)
Kurt Schrader (OR-5)
David Scott (GA-13)
Heath Shuler (NC-11)

Snatching Defeat from the Jaws of Victory

By Dave

A TPM Reader recounts their conversation with Barney Frank (D-MA):
I live in Barney Frank's district, and I called his office this morning. To my surprise, he took my call and I asked him why on earth couldn't the House simply pass the Senate version of the health care bill. He told me straight up that the votes weren't there to pass the Senate bill. He said that labor is totally against it, the abortion caucus is against it, and more than a few progressives were against it.
I asked him about Democrats' prospects in the 2010 election if they don't get something done on health care. He told me it would be worse electorally for Democrats if they passed the bill versus dropping it and facing voters having done nothing. I told him I disagreed with him on that point, but I suppose he knows more about this stuff than I do. I hope.

I whole heartedly agree that if Democrats let HCR die, there will be disaster in November.

But Franks comments are illuminating. What is the problem here? Why won't House Dems pass the Senate bill? The answer: Democratic rank-and-file won't let them. It's our fault. We haven't given them the political cover.

Some Democrats, let's call them Hamsher Democrats, appear to be totally delusional. They talk as though they are oblivious to Senate politics. And so they lobby the House to hold a position that will ultimately yeild nothing for Americans. They say public option, or nothing.

Let's be clear, the Senate Bill will cover an additional 30 million Americans, begin to control costs, reduce the deficit, create stability for the unemployed, give access to those with pre-existing conditions, and add other regulations that will make our system more moral and just. But the Hamsher Dems say this just simply is not enough and when given the choice, they prefer nothing at all. They are out of their minds. If this sounds like your friend, coworker, spouse, or colleague, please, tell them to take a deep breath, look clearly at the political landscape, and stop hurting reform.

Tell them to, at least, recognize self-interest. If Democrats pass reform soon, they will face a difficult but manageable mid-term election. If they fold, or fail because of trivia, they might as well give the Republicans the keys back now, because it is all over.

Hyperspace is SO becoming a reality!



by E.doc


Okay. Get ready for the coolest thing EVER! Well, in nerd terms, which I totally am, even though I am not really the spacey type of nerd.

I'm not a Trekky, but the idea of hyperspace becoming reality is AWESOME!


The machine they are working with is even endowed with a totally corny totally unorginal science-fictiony name too...(insert music from 2001:A Space Odyssey)

The Z Machine!

Apparently this machine was originally intended to be used as a device that tested materials in extreme conditions of temperature and pressure, but it is also the worlds largest x-ray generator. It can propel things at 34 kilometers per second. For all of you with no idea how fast that is, it is faster than the speed that the Earth travels around the Sun. It is also three times faster than is required to get out of Earth's gravitational pull.

Let's make this easier. One Kilometer is about 0.6 miles. 34 kilometers is about 21.13 miles. Imagine traveling 21 miles in one second. That's like...pull-the-skin-off-your-face fast.

This technology could make it so that we can visit Mars on a daytrip! Total Recall style!

All of my science fiction fantasies are coming true in an instant. I love you Arnold!

Another Reason to Love Blueberries


by E.doc


Blueberry Juice helps your memory!

Dirty Everest?


by E.doc


There is now an expedition in the works to "clean up Everest". I never really considered it, but Everest neads a face lift. Apparently, not all climbers/mountaineers take care of their garbage. I guess they figure that since it's in the middle of nowhere and basically in a different atmosphere than the rest of us, nobody will care that they leave their old canisters, markers, water bottles, etc. lying around.


Unfortunately, this expedition is risky, because most of the garbage is accumulated in the "death zone" of Everest. Maybe the previous climbers just wanted to get the hell out, leaving anything behind that would hinder their escape, including the dead bodies of their fallen teammates. Totally weird in my opinion.


Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Let's Go Get 'Em!

By Dave

Ezra Klein recommends Democrats watch this scene from Animal House. Twice.

Pomplamoose Before Bed

By Dave

It's been a disheartening day on the political front. So, I leave you with Pomplamoose's new song "If You Think You Need Some Lovin" before I'm off to bed. It cheered me up a little. And who knows maybe we'll be greeted by better, more sensible news in the morning. Enjoy!

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Democrat's Implode, Blame Each Other and Decide They Aren't Fit to Govern

By Dave

Well, as predicted, Brown won tonight in MA and the Democrats will lose their 60th vote in the Senate. This isn't the worst news in the world. The Democrats still have a sizable majority and they still have time to make the HCR reform a reality.

The worst news in the world is that congressional and senate Democrats have decided now is the time to admit defeat and lie over on their backs.

See if Dems had any backbone or spine, they could use the next fifteen days until Brown is seated to quickly hash out their differences and pass a conference bill.

But instead we get Democrats like Jim Webb (D-VA) who say stuff like this:
"In many ways the campaign in Massachusetts became a referendum not only on health care reform but also on the openness and integrity of our government process. It is vital that we restore the respect of the American people in our system of government and in our leaders. To that end, I believe it would only be fair and prudent that we suspend further votes on health care legislation until Senator-elect Brown is seated."
Are you fu*&^ing kidding me!? What bullshit! How dare you abandon the American people!? How cowardly. How disgusting.

51% of Massachusetts voters does not equal a national referendum on health care. You've been working on this for over 9 months, get it done already. Now! The bill you are now abandoning will improve the deficit. It will begin to control health care costs. It will expand coverage to an additional 30 million Americans and it will give new access to people with pre-existing conditions. The American people will respect you when you pass reform and explain to them in clear language what it will do for them.

Fourteen months ago, the American people entrusted Democrats with control of both houses of Congress and the White House. Sen. Webb has all but said that they don't deserve any of it. According to Sen. Webb, we can restore "the respect of the American people in our system of government and in our leaders" by killing the centerpiece of the Democratic legislative agenda. Way to go, Webb!

This is what my head feels like:



Since Sen. Webb has decided to cripple reform in the Senate until the Republican, who opposes reform, can be seated, the only option still available is for the House to pass the Senate Bill, as is, and then try to hash out their differences at a later date, maybe with a reconciliation bill. But it's hard to read how open this path is.

We have optimistic statements from Speaker Pelosi:
 "Whatever happens in Massachusetts, we have to do that," she said. "And whatever happens in Massachusetts we will have quality affordable health care for all Americans, and it will be soon."
 And not so optimistic statements from Rep. Barney Frank:
I have two reactions to the election in Massachusetts. One, I am disappointed. Two, I feel strongly that the Democratic majority in congress must respect the process and make no effort to bypass the electoral results. If Martha Coakley had won, I believe we could have worked out a reasonable compromise between the House and Senate health care bills. But since Scott Brown has won and the Republicans now have 41 votes in the senate, that approach is no longer appropriate. I am hopeful that some Republican senators will be willing to discuss a revised version of health care reform. Because I do not think that the country would be well served by the health care status quo. But our respect for democratic procedures must rule out any effort to pass a health care bill as if the Massachusetts election had not happened. Going forward, I hope there will be a serious effort to change the senate rule which means that 59 are not enough to pass major legislation, but those are the rules by which the health care bill was considered, and it would be wrong to change them in the middle of this process.

I don't get it. Don't Democrats understand that this is the choice between necessary and important reform or total, complete, abject failure? 

Failure on HCR means more people will continue to suffer in our broken health care system. No cost control, no reduction of the deficit. It means that even with the greatest majority since the time of LBJ, Democrats can't accomplish their most important legislative agenda. With failure, you tell the world you are unfit to govern. If you fail, you will lose the base and you will lose the center. It means an stronger, more energized opposition. Failure now means failure next November.

For God's sake, pass the Senate Bill in the House. Claim victory and move on. Stop asphyxiating your party with inaction, cowardice, and incompetence.

mashup funtime ok!

By Nate

the world seems occasionally enamored of good mashups. i, like the world, can be a true sucker for them. Enter the Magical Mystery Chambers is a wu-tang / beatles mashup that a friend sent my way, and it's pretty damn groovy. check it out if you're feeling a little adventurous!

It's been a while!

By Nate

my posts have been few and far between for a variety of reasons (online gaming and the realization that winter break is almost up and i haven't wasted nearly enough time being the largest contributing factors) but here's one of them that i want to share: The Phoenix Requiem is a webcomic by a friend of a friend, and it's impressive in nearly every conceivable way. it's a pretty fully-realized world, very rounded characters, and fantastic (in the classic sense) stories. it hooked me right from the beginning, and if y'like it, shout out! i've got all kinds've tidbits like this that deserve some exposure.

You want to watch it.

By Dr. Skankenstein

I recently took my lady to the Mayan theater in Denver to see the Terry Gilliam jam "Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus" starring Heath Ledger, Johnny Depp, Jude Law, and Colin Farrell. It is quite a delightful movie with great imagery and one of Gilliam's more accessible plots. It also features a fantastic performance from Tom Waits. You want to watch this movie.

But as a small aside, don't bother seeing it at the Mayan. Cramped seating, small screen, and sub-par sound did not make me feel like 20 bucks was a reasonable price for my experience. I did notice that they do have a bar and espresso options, so perhaps that's a mitigating factor for people who demand booze/caffiene with their movies. This all being said, it is one of 4 theaters in the Denver area playing the film. It is also has more showtimes than everyone else. The Mayan also routinely brings indie films and alternate programming to the Denver area. But for a movie like "Imaginarium", you deserve to see it with surroundings and technology that match its stunning visuals.

Watch the trailer here.

Monday, January 18, 2010

Diamonds on Different Planets



by E.doc

This is a cool article about an idea that some scientists came up with. Basically, there could be a butt-load of diamonds on planets like Uranus and Neptune, which have very high pressures and temperatures, and have a high carbon content. They even think that there may be oceans of diamonds...literally. The temperatures and pressures are so high that the diamonds could have been liquefied and have solid diamond icebergs.

These diamond oceans could also explain the tilted magnetic poles on those planets. Earth's magnetic poles are on relatively opposite sides of the planet, but Uranus and Neptune have poles that can be up to 60 degrees off of the north-south axis. The diamond oceans could be getting in the way of the magnetic field.

"Pork from a Petri Dish"


by E.doc

Okay. So, I am a pretty big fan of science. I think technological advances are awesome and necessary and helpful, etc. Stem cell research? Greatest thing ever.

But I think I draw the line at growing edible meat from a petri dish.

Something freaks me out about not eating "real" food. Or rather, food that didn't come to be by natural forces...I think. I can't describe it. Read for yourself.

Do you think this can help solve world hunger?

Here's what treehugger.com thinks about it, and how petri-fied pork really does make sense.

Pointing Fingers

By Dave

Bernard Avishai at Talking Points Memo vents:
 I wish I had a bluefish dinner for every time Coakley referred to the health package as "not perfect." It all came out so forced and fake.
The real question Democrats have to ask themselves is: how come the greatest piece of social legislation since Medicare is something a progressive Democratic candidate for Ted Kennedy's seat has to speak so defensively about?
And we can look no further than Howard Dean, and MSNBC, and Arianna Huffington, and, yes, some columnists at the Times and bloggers here at TPM--you know, real progressives--who have lambasted Obama again and again since last March over arguable need-to-haves like the "public option," as if nobody else was listening. They've been thinking: "Oh, if only we ran things, how much more subtle would the legislation be," as if 41 senators add up to subtle. Meanwhile the undecideds are thinking: "Hell, if his own people think he's a sell-out and jerk, why should we support this?"
Avishai's frustration is understandable. It seems the Democratic 'big tent' coalition cracked against the unity of the GOP opposition. Unfortunately, and somewhat predictably, Dems began to turn on each other. Unfortunate, because it took conservatives years to eventually turn against Bush. It only took liberals ten months. It's predictable because divide and conquer was their strategy. We've been demoralized because every issue, even the simplest, has required a supermajority to pass. We've been disheartened because logic and reason have been thrown out the window and craziness wins in the 24-hour news cycle. This was their plan all along, and somehow we didn't see it coming.

The real villain has been the Republican Party of No. They made this awful mess we're in. They spent like no tomorrow and caused massive deficits. They illegally wiretapped US citizens. They instigated, not one, but two failed wars. They created secret, illegal torture programs and even now they call for even more torture and more war. They scoffed at global warming and fought against science. They gave the rich tax breaks while cutting programs for the poor, and then had the audacity to sit lazily back when New Orleans drowned.  For eight years, they wasted our time and money with their corruption, lies, and downright incompetence. Americans should hate their guts. But they don't. Conservatives have one advantage. To them politics is war. They admit nothing and give no ground. They know what flag they fight under. Most importantly, they will do anything to resume power.

If we hope to defeat this, Democrats need to rally. They need to find a home under the 'big tent' and they need to find room for others. Stop fighting. Stop pointing fingers at conservative, or liberal, or progressive Dems. If they are willing to work towards the same common goals then we are going to need all of them.

Most of all we need to stop moping because things didn't turn out as idyllically as we had dreamed. Yes, it's true. Health care reform will not usher in a utopian age of health and wellness but it will make things a hell of a lot better than they are today. We've already made huge strides in putting America back on track. Feel good about it. Spread the word. Get back in the game because losing is not an option. Not if you care about the future of our country.

For Coakley: How to Campaign

By Wade

In case you're curious about some of the reasons behind Martha Coakley's political nose-dive, here's an edifying Boston Globe article:

Campaigns are an opportunity for candidates to hear from the public they want to represent, but Coakley doesn’t seem to believe this is necessary. At a rare meet-and-greet with voters Wednesday, she worked a room of a couple of hundred senior citizens in Dorchester in under 10 minutes. Then she turned her back on the crowd as she spoke to reporters, leaving the seniors to awkwardly applaud remarks they weren’t meant to hear.

As she quickly made her way to the exits, it took an outreach worker at the senior center to insist that she address the crowd, which she did, and well.

*insert resounding forehead slap here*

Seriously, this is campaigning 101. I know this, because this is exactly what Dave and I did when we campaigned for his position on city council in Lafayette. Dave was a 22-year-old unknown at the time. We had people tell us he was a "loose cannon," we had old men yell at us, and we faced those who distrusted his youth and enthusiasm, perceiving it as naivete.

So what did we do that earned Dave a four-year spot on council (meaning he got the third-highest amount of votes while facing several established candidates)? We took lists of registered voters around the entire town with us. We went door-to-door as much as we were able, starting early in the morning and finishing when it got dark. We specifically traveled to areas of Lafayette where we knew people would disagree with him. Because even if they disagree with you, even if they don't like you, most people will still respect that you took the time to present yourself and what you stand for to them. I was amazed at the number of times a person's expression went from distrustful to enthusiastic, from dour to interested, from annoyed to amazed.

A famous Michael Jordan quote comes to mind: "You miss 100% of the shots you don't take." This applies to everything. If only Coakley had watched a little more basketball.

Krugman Sez: Obama Shoulda Blamed Bush More

By Wade

If you've overheard Fox News at all in the past year, it's likely that you've been treated to kvetching about Obama putting too much blame on Bush, and that he ought to live in the present, etc. etc. (a rhetoric notoriously absent when Bush said similar things about Clinton). However, Krugman disagrees(emphasis mine):
The Obama administration’s troubles are the result not of excessive ambition, but of policy and political misjudgments. The stimulus was too small; policy toward the banks wasn’t tough enough; and Mr. Obama didn’t do what Ronald Reagan, who also faced a poor economy early in his administration, did — namely, shelter himself from criticism with a narrative that placed the blame on previous administrations.

And because it tickles me in relation to my previous post about the WSJ, here's another good Krugman quote:

It’s often forgotten now, but unemployment actually soared after Reagan’s 1981 tax cut. Reagan, however, had a ready answer for critics: everything going wrong was the result of the failed policies of the past. In effect, Reagan spent his first few years in office continuing to run against Jimmy Carter.

I simultaneously agree and disagree with the rest of Krugman's sentiments. On the one hand, he talks about how Obama hasn't really accomplished that much, and how he needs to focus on two remaining options: pushing financial and health care reform. He's right; these are things that must happen. Krugman says that "not passing a bill would surely be [Democrats'] political doom." And he's right.

On the other hand, Dave's had two different posts detailing Obama's accomplishments and effectiveness. Let's not be giving aid and comfort to the enemy now. Make sure the Republicans know that we still want the same things we wanted when we overwhelmingly elected President Obama, and that we're still willing to back him and fight for what Krugman himself calls "the right thing to do."

One of the key strengths of the Party of No is their ability to remain unified while preying on the fractiousness of the left. It's like the Democrats are constantly trying to prevent a big game of rock paper scissors Hippies who hate pollution protest the Union workers who are against Immigrants taking their jobs who are against the Supporters of Gay Marriage and so on down the line (this is obviously not an accurate representation, but you get the point).

What we have to realize is what the right realized long ago: we are stronger than the sum of our parts. Every election they win is a representation of this. Most polls in the past few years put the amount of left-leaning Americans anywhere from five to twenty-five percent above the amount of right-leaning Americans. We have the power, and we need to remember that. It was proven a year ago when we chose Hope and Change over those who sought to continue the downward spiral of the Bush years. Compromising and taking the good with the bad is always better than refusing to accept anything but 100% goodness. Obama knows this well.

Andrew Sullivan: Insightful and Right

By Wade

I'm not even surprised that things look so grim for Coakley. Sad, not surprised.

The first full paragraph sums up the major BS of the last year so succinctly it's beautiful:
I can see no alternative scenario but a huge - staggeringly huge - victory for the FNC/RNC machine tomorrow. They crafted a strategy of total oppositionism to anything Obama proposed a year ago. Remember they gave him zero votes on even the stimulus in his first weeks. They saw health insurance reform as Obama's Waterloo, and, thanks in part to the dithering Democrats, they beat him on that hill. They have successfully channeled all the rage at the massive debt and recession the president inherited on Obama after just one year.


Congratulations, Republicans. Your quagmire in this country is nearly as ugly as the quagmires you've created across the Atlantic.

Massachusetts, I'm talking to you now. I know we've had at least a couple readers from your neck of the woods (and anyone who knows any swing voters there, pass this on).

Don't think of Coakley as a replacement for a beloved figure from a political dynasty. Don't think of her even as the sub-par candidate she is. Think of her as the least objectionable alternative. Think of her as the stop-gap measure to keep Republicans from succeeding in their goal as the "Party of No." Think of her, as we so often must in politics, as a means to an end. Think of her as the instrument that will help enact the health care policies we need in this country, that Ted Kennedy fought for the majority of his political career. Think of her as, at the very least, better than the guy who seems pleased by the idea of violating her back door with a hot metal rod.

I know she's not who we want. All she can be now is who we've got.

If You Want a Shriveled Soul

By Wade

Here's where you can get one.
Ever wanted to cause Pat Robertson a massive headache? give him back pain? jab him in the crotch? Of course you have! Well then BID NOW to own your very own pysical representation of the dark, dark soul of Pat Robertson.

Accessories included with the doll are Pat's very own "HOLY" BIBLE and BAG OF MONEY taken from real Americans! WOW!

BID NOW!!!!